![]() |
|
In the Forums... |
Posted: May 8, 2001 Written by: Tuan "Solace" Nguyen Benchmarks 3DMark2001 ![]() Here we see both the Asus and the Leadtek GeForce3 cards take the lead and stay quite ahead of the GeForce2 Ultra. Asus holds a very slight margin ahead of Leadtek but it’s not a significant amount and definitely not enough to warrant which card is faster. At 1024x768, the V8200 holds a 0.5% lead above the WinFast GeForce3. I guess the real test in speed will turn up when we try overclocking both cards. AquaMark ![]() With AquaMark, the tiny lead that Asus held in 3DMark2001 is gone and we see it slip a step behind Leadtek. Again, these are small differences in the range of 1FPS and should not be taken seriously. All two GeForce3 cards still smoke the GeForce2 Ultra in DirectX 8 games and this is of course understandable considering GeForce3 was meant for DX8. MDK2 ![]() MDK2 tells the same story as AquaMark. Nothing much to say here -- both the V8200 Deluxe and the WinFast GF3 are so perform nearly identical to each other. Maybe those shortened traces didn’t have a speed effect after all. They’re great still because reducing line noise slightly improves image quality when you’re dealing with the analog filters. |
||
|
---|