Most CPU friendly anit-virus software?

Discussion in 'Tech' started by BrentN, Sep 8, 2005.

  1. BrentN Banned

    Posts:
    2,324
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Calgary Alberta
    Just curious, but I know that norton isn't. It uses alot of resources, and the AVG free one slowed down my system quite a bit when I tried it before.

    Can anyone recommend an antivirus that is system resource friendly?

    I've done without an antivirus for 2 years now, and becuase I know what im doing, I have never gotten a virus. However, things change, and now that I do alot more downloading, double clicking a program could lead to a virus infection.
    For 2 years I have downloaded only from trusted sites (demos and stuff) and generally downloaded content that is virus free (music/video). I don't use an open email like shaw or telus, instead I use virus free hotmail.

    But times are changing and I want to use my shawmail, and im not even going to consider it until I get some form of antivirus.

    any recommendations?

    thx
  2. Goofus Maximus Too old to be this dumb!

    Posts:
    6,482
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    St. Louis area, but in Illinois
    All the better ones will use more CPU time, as the ones that don't use as much CPU resources, are also the ones that don't catch as many viruses/virii/whatever. AVG is less of a hog than Norton, and I like it well enough.

    Mostly, I don't run the background scanner; just the e-mail scanner, and scanning files from the context menu (right-click menu) of files I just downloaded.
  3. Drakkon New Member

    Posts:
    890
    Trophy Points:
    0
  4. mushu New Member

    Posts:
    464
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tampa
  5. Justin3 Balls of Steel

    Posts:
    538
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Shelton, CT
    Norton antivirus 2005 does take up about 32MB of system RAM to run in the background, That is because it is always protecting your system. If you want something thats not as safe but doesnt use as much ram then get PC Chillin.
  6. thadood I Am The Black Wizards

    Posts:
    4,019
    Trophy Points:
    53
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    I've switched from NAV to Avast and I couldn't be happier.
  7. mushu New Member

    Posts:
    464
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tampa
    trust me, nod32 is the best you'll find.

    check out the vb100:

    Results Overview: Eset (NOD32)
    Results summary


    33 Success / 3 Failure / 5 No Entry
  8. Wendy26 New Member

    Posts:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I use AVG, but that alone is not enough I use Anti vir, both free, and Edwido, I think is the name, only 30 days free, but it scanned and found something on my system on the 1st try, Also I keep PC Cillin as a backup, and online you have Panda and Trend, which are both excellent onlin scanners, but Ive found that only 1 Anti Virus prog is not enough protection, but 3, I never have any problems now that I have all this protection and most of it's free.
  9. Cartman New Member

    Posts:
    1,762
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    United States of American
    why even use virus scanners if you dont want one that'll do a good job... may as well not even use one...
  10. j0k3r El Chupacabra

    Posts:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    http://localhost/
    I already posted in the software forum, but for the record I'll say it again. That is retarded.
  11. SoulAssassin Car Ramrod

    Posts:
    4,663
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Cincinnati, OH
    LOL...so true
  12. Shrivara New Member

    Posts:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Banglore
    no one's speaking of mcafe
  13. Torx Indigenous Nudist

    Posts:
    19,346
    Trophy Points:
    88
    kaspersky all the way.
    regularly updated defs through the DAY, not every other day.

    returns better results than other av's out there.

    2nd place goes to symantec av enterprise edition, ALOT less bloated than norton av but still has a couple ding-a-lings lingering in the background
  14. mushu New Member

    Posts:
    464
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tampa
    honestly, turst me on this, nod32.

    anyone who says kapersky is easy on resources is wrong. it's a super av, but pretty resource heavy.
  15. BrentN Banned

    Posts:
    2,324
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Calgary Alberta
    Just to update this thread, but I got a free copy of mcafee from work (prize). It was a week before I finally gave it a shot on my notebook.

    In terms of speed, it blows away shaw secure. Shaw secure, I will never use again, not becuase its bad, but it takes up huge amounts of resources compared to mcafee! The notebook is much much faster and still secure now.
  16. mushu New Member

    Posts:
    464
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tampa
    mcafee is crap. :/