Population Reduction 2012 Watch the whole thing, been looking at things like this for a while now, getting quite bad.
I've had my suspicions and are seeing a bit of evidence to suport some of that paranoia. Where did the massive profits go fro before the bubble burst? There's just too many questions I have to ask myself that the answers tend to point to a common theme-> NWO. I'm nearly ready: http://www.tweak3d.net/forums/off-topic/cottage-living-updated-pix-44321/
From what I heard China's been doing it for a while, I've heard abotu new borns being thrown in the street to die etc. But this is a, and I can't believe I'm saying this, more humain way of population control than whats being suggested, and from the evidence it looks like its going to begin in America, with those FEMA camps you got poping up everywhere
yea during christmas my uncle started going off on a rant about fema, concentration camps, and mass ordering of body bags and caskets.. i kept my mouth shut because noone in my family knows my tinfoil identity.. but listening to him, i just grinned.
Pretty scary if you think about it. I personally endorse a massive population reduction, but not like this! I guess we'll find out how much truth it has this December.
Actually the most common method is formaldehyde injection in the soft spot of the skull seconds after crowning during birth. Floods the brain and kills the infant before it's out the birth canal. Formaldehyde is fairly cheap too.
They only ever existed on paper. Executives paychecks were powered by other people's mortgages and credit cards. Oil prices shot through the roof just because there were so many people investing these "paper profits" in commodities that had better returns than the T-Bills they used to buy. The whole mortgage mess started because of the insatiable desire to sink "paper profits" in Triple-A mortgage-backed securities, that caused lendors to scrape the bottom of the barrel just to fill the unending demand for them. There are already way too many of us on this planet. We're close to scouring every last tuna on the face of the planet from the oceans, and our waste runoff is killing off vast portions of the ocean through algae-bloom induced hypoxia. This doesn't even count the CO2 related acidification of the ocean in general. CO2; it's not just for global warming! We can turn the Sea into Soda Pop too! We need to cut back the population of the planet drastically. The factors against it are: 1.) Poor regions breed like rabbits just to make sure that one or two survive to continue the family name. 2.) Aged populations in developed countries need sufficient workers in the younger generations to support them, lest the economy sink under the weight of the elder-care financial burden. 3.) Cheap (until recently) oil made unsustainable agriculture practices popular to the agricultural/industrial complex (there really is one!).
What is the point of reducing the population, then there is no one to control. Also Fluoride is bad in large amounts. So is Salt, and what is it made of? Sodium and chloride two items that can be combined to make dangerous substances. Just because it is there does not mean it is dangerous. I'm going back to drinking my arsenic.
I think the world needs a non-bias, non prejudicial overhaul. There are alot of individual/groups that has no reason to exist... Not talking about jail or some thing; just pure Nature's fury taking out bad with good. Among the ones left standing; majority of those will be highly adaptive, strong will and hopefully responsible people.
This is a little different. This doesn't discriminate between race. I'm having a hard time believing that they would kill off that much of the population on purpose. Earth wouldn't be in as bad of shape if we reduced pollution, stopped destroying tons of land for development of urban areas, stopped polluting water sources, etc. If we all lived in large cities where you can fit more people there would be less destruction of the world around us. Overpopulation is a very bad thing, that I can agree with. But going about it by killing over 90% of the population is just retarded. Where the hell are you going to bury 5.5 billion bodies? How are you going to keep diseases from spreading from the hundreds of dead bodies on every street corner in major cities? How are you going to keep the world going with that few of people? Sacrifice all of the industries that we have? Do they really want to take that large of a step backwards in science/industry?
Hitler had the right idea, just the wrong selection criteria. Don't herd people into camps and kill them for being a particular race or creed. Off these people instead: 1) People who drive rudely while talking on the phone. 2) Anyone attending Jonas Brothers concerts. 3) Anyone with a BMI higher than 40. 4) Convicted murders, rapists, and repeat criminals. 5) The Jonas Brothers. We can keep expanding this list, but you get the idea. We'd remove undesirables and lower the surplus population.
Who needs selection criteria? Just give a free AK47 with 1000 rounds of ammo to every teenaged boy on the planet, and offer a bounty for every head he brings in. The population will take a nosedive; no selecting needed!
Imagine how awesome it would be for the survivors though? Not to advocate a rapid reduction (aka herd thinning), but if tomorrow you were to suddenly wake up and find yourself in that situation it would be awesome. Tons of resources, massive reductions if pollution, traffic, crime, etc.
Yeah it would be amazing but shit 6 billion to 500 million. that's like a shitty chance. Reminds me of Bill Burr Bill Burr - Animal Population | | Comedy Central
There seems to be a lot of different ideas about what may occur, from the death of everyone, to a new chapter in humanity where everyone will be at peace. It's hard to say. On paper, strictly speaking by terms of keeping humanity afloat, weeding down the population is probably the best idea. I just hope that I get to stick around if it happens =)
Vietnam has been doing it for ten years now. "One or two kids, for the motherland" It's been working great for them.
