That's the argument for choice? I know people who DO live with their parents along with their own kids on welfare. I've known people who had a boyfriend make $35/hr at a union job not get married because it would end their single parent help/welfare from the gov't (don't know their exact benefits but getting married would end them). Wiskas is right. If they are on it for an extended period of time then something is not right, it's not a lifetime handout. A very extended family member lives with her mother and won't get a job because for each kid she has, she gets more money. She has zero incentive to get an education or get a job because the gov't is going to pay for it anyways. This shit happens far too often and it gets ignored by the libs because we wouldn't want to infringe on someone's rights who is essentially stealing and being a leech on society.